All applications to the Data Curation Network Workshops are evaluated using the following rubric unless otherwise indicated. Please contact us with any questions you might have!

Evaluation CriteriaFair or NA – 1 PointGood – 2 PointsExcellent – 3 Points
1. What level of impact will the training have upon the applicant (either as professional development or building institutional capacity)? The impact of training will be low. The applicant and/or institution is already well established or well-resourced in the field.The impact of the training will be moderate. The applicant or institution is somewhat well established or well-resourced in the field, but training will help move them towards becoming better established.The impact of the training will be high. The applicant or institution is neither well established or well-resourced in the field, and training will help them establish a curation service.
2. How will you use specialized data curation skills in your job?The applicant either won’t use specialized data curation skills in their job or fails to explain how they will.The applicant might use limited specialized data curation skills in their job and/or explanation may lack clarity or focus.The applicant clearly explains how they will use specialized data curation skills in their job.
3.Fulfills EDI and inclusivity goalsThe applicant does not address diversity, equity or inclusion and does not address how their identity, background, institutional affiliation, and/or lived experience informs their participation.Applicant refers somewhat to diversity, equity, and inclusion or is unclear about how their identity, background, institutional affiliation, and/or lived experience informs their participation. Applicant clearly addresses diversity, equity and inclusion and draws a clear connection to how their identity, background, institutional affiliation, and/or lived experience informs their participation.  


This work may be copied, modified and distributed without asking permission. Suggested citation: Wright, Sarah J. “Workshop Application Rubric,” https://hdl.handle.net/11299/252652.